<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LG 42SL9000 LED TV Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ledtvreviews.co.uk/lg-led-tv/lg-42-inch-led-tv/lg-42sl9000-led-tv-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ledtvreviews.co.uk/lg-led-tv/lg-42-inch-led-tv/lg-42sl9000-led-tv-review/</link>
	<description>LED TV reviews, news and best prices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: avinash</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtvreviews.co.uk/lg-led-tv/lg-42-inch-led-tv/lg-42sl9000-led-tv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 07:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtvreviews.co.uk/?p=207#comment-229</guid>
		<description>love worthy to watch this latest invention by lG, but alis it could have been better that it has been suplied with audio/video cable of atleast 3 meters along with tv, which hampers its performance by lose of video gain and clearity as everybody has to purchase the cable from local market which does not match with the tv specification,

kindly solve this at the earliest,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love worthy to watch this latest invention by lG, but alis it could have been better that it has been suplied with audio/video cable of atleast 3 meters along with tv, which hampers its performance by lose of video gain and clearity as everybody has to purchase the cable from local market which does not match with the tv specification,</p>
<p>kindly solve this at the earliest,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puscifer</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtvreviews.co.uk/lg-led-tv/lg-42-inch-led-tv/lg-42sl9000-led-tv-review/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Puscifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtvreviews.co.uk/?p=207#comment-48</guid>
		<description>I wonder how this one does with glare. It&#039;s the only downside to my 40B6000, although i don&#039;t mind lowering the shades..
One thing i&#039;d like LG to tell us (rather than the all-so-subjective constrast) is the power consumption, since mine is currently draining ~95w with auto-dimming turned off (a lot lower than the 140w announced). If anyone buys one of these please post your findings.

I rather enjoy the borderless design and hope to see one soon so i can get a better look of what i might have missed if waited 6 mo.

Although can&#039;t help but feel a bit ripped off since this design is essentially the same, minus borders. Same depth (-0.05cm) and alot more weight (~5.5Kg) which might not be a bad thing on it&#039;s own.. Koreans, hei?! ;/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how this one does with glare. It&#8217;s the only downside to my 40B6000, although i don&#8217;t mind lowering the shades..<br />
One thing i&#8217;d like LG to tell us (rather than the all-so-subjective constrast) is the power consumption, since mine is currently draining ~95w with auto-dimming turned off (a lot lower than the 140w announced). If anyone buys one of these please post your findings.</p>
<p>I rather enjoy the borderless design and hope to see one soon so i can get a better look of what i might have missed if waited 6 mo.</p>
<p>Although can&#8217;t help but feel a bit ripped off since this design is essentially the same, minus borders. Same depth (-0.05cm) and alot more weight (~5.5Kg) which might not be a bad thing on it&#8217;s own.. Koreans, hei?! ;/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

